on 09-13-2010 11:09 AM
Hi,
Whenever there is a Value or Import exception,port is not blocked but now customer wants to block the port in case of Value Exception as there can be scenario where a record is updated in the source system but due to some issue it failed under value exception. A different user updates the same record in source system and it pass through MDM correctly. Now some one will check the value exception and process the record manually which will overwrite the changes .
Kindly suggest if there is some method to block port in case of value and import exception.
Thanks and Regards,
Neethu Joy
Hi Neethu,
The port will be blocked ONLY in case of Structural Exceptions.
Even if you set the import for Fail, i believe you can see the status as "Has Exceptions" , but the port will not be blocked.
As a work around, you can use PI for monitoring and check the file which could not be imported.
Thanks,
Priti
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the help but i wanted a workaround and has found one.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
My requirement is such,
whenever there is an exception be it structural, value or import, a mail should be triggered to the support team, and the port should be block, till the exception is resolved.
What do you mean by process level changes, not getting it...
Regards,
Abhishek
Edited by: Abhishek Biwal on Jan 13, 2012 5:28 PM
Hi Neethu
As rightly explained blocking the port for Value and Import exceptions is not possible.
Now coming to the initial requirement- *there can be scenario where a record is updated in the source system but due to some issue it failed under value exception. A different user updates the same record in source system and it pass through MDM correctly. Now some one will check the value exception and process the record manually which will overwrite the changes .
Why should this happen- For the lookup values how are you refreshing MDM from the source system? If this is not automated the above makes a scenario for automatically refreshing the lookup values from the source system to MDM.
Also if the User1 is wrongly editing a record in source system MDM by design is not allowing to import that record. User2 edits(corrects) the record in source system again which is reflected in MDM correctly. Here if the client needs to see the changes made at record level (by user1/all incorrect updates) then the change tracking or logs should be seen/developed in the source system itself- since MDM has been designed to filter correct records flow only.
Hope this helps-Ravi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
As fas as i am concerned this is not possible.You can put constraint on structural exception only.
Thanks,
Sudhanshu
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Neethu,
As per my understanding, value exceptions come only if you don't have that value already existing in MDM. So in this case try setting Property Upmapped Value Handling = Fail in configuration options of MDM Import Manager and save this in your Map.
So whenever a new value which does not exist in MDM comes, this file record will fail and thus you can have file available(block) in value exception folder of your repository port.
Just check and revert with result.
Regards,
Mandeep Saini
Hi Neethu,
Kindly Follow the step :
1. select Inbound port in MDM console and set Block on strctural exceptions = "Yes"
2. change in import map i.e Import manager configuration setting Under Default MDIS Handling -
>
Upmapped Value Handling = Ignore\Add\*Fail* Set to Fail
Hope Above mention point will resolved the problem if not revert back
Thanks,
Jignesh Patel
Edited by: jignesh patel on Sep 13, 2010 3:58 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.