Error while reading ID of own business system from the SLD

[Former Member]

Hi there,

We are facing a problem with most of our interfaces. The thing is that most of them use ABAP proxy communication between XI and IS-U, ECC, BI.. servers.

We had not had any trouble so far but right now, the messages failed in SXI_MONITOR showing these error messages:

<SAP:Error xmlns:SAP="http://sap.com/xi/XI/Message/30" xmlns:SOAP="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" SOAP:mustUnderstand="1">

<SAP:Category>XIServer</SAP:Category>

<SAP:Code area="INTERNAL">SLD_NO_OWN_BS</SAP:Code>

<SAP:P1>ECP</SAP:P1>

<SAP:P2>300</SAP:P2>

<SAP:P3 />

<SAP:P4 />

<SAP:AdditionalText />

<SAP:Stack>Error while reading ID of own business system from the SLD for system ECP and client 300</SAP:Stack>

<SAP:Retry>M</SAP:Retry>

</SAP:Error>

If we perform a SLDCHECK in XI (integration server) it works perfectly and the BS does exist.

However, if we log into the application server and do the same, it fails because in SLDAPICUST two SLDs are maintained (the XI one and the EP one) and the primary one is the EP one, which has no BS details.

We think that this is the main reason because if we change the primary SLD in SLDAPICUST the error gets fixed, but there is something weird here:

Why all of this did not happen till now?

Is it necessary to maintained SLDAPICUST in all Application servers connected to XI and point all of them to the same SLD that is pointed from XI?

Do we need to create a Full export from the XI SLD and import it in EP SLD?

Could you please help us on this?

Thanks alot in advance and best regards,

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

>>Is it necessary to maintained SLDAPICUST in all Application servers connected to XI and point all of them to the same SLD that is pointed from XI?

Yes. This is mandatory for your proxies/idoc communication from/to ECC with XI.

>>Why all of this did not happen till now?

That is really weird. Are you sure you had both the SLDs and the primary one set to EP in ECC?

Regards

Jai

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Yes, completely sure, i asked BASIS team and they told me there was no change at all in that TCODE.

So, you are confirming this is how it has to be:

In XI: SLDAPICUST has one entry -> its own SLD

In ECC, BI, SRM, ISU: SLDAPICUST has two entries, but the primary one is the one below

Is that correct?

Thanks a lot in advance

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

>>In XI: SLDAPICUST has one entry -> its own SLD

In ECC, BI, SRM, ISU: SLDAPICUST has two entries, but the primary one is the one below

That is correct.

Regards

Jai