on 07-05-2010 10:01 AM
Hello Friends,
In business partner maintenance (BP), one employee assigned to multiple companies in relationship tab.
Following are the entries observed in relationship tab in BP Transaction code.
Is employee of
xxx(BP number) u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to -->1st entry
xxx(BP number) u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to --> 2nd entry
Ideally one employee should assigned to one company only.
Kindly let me know how to delete the relationship.
We are using release SRM 5.0 with classic extended scenario.
The organization structure is HR Replicated.
Thanks in Advance,
Pithani Suresh
HI,
Go to PPOMA_BBP
Go to the Attribute tab and remove which ever company is not required for the employee
please try
Regards
Ganesh Kumar.G
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello Ganesh,
Thank you for providing information.
The employee is not assigned to multiple companies. The assignment is related to orgnizational unit.
In organization structure (PPOSA_BBP), the user/position is assigned to one organization unit only
More details about this issue,
we find the relationship of the user/position in BP T.code (Relationship Tab), it is showing the relationship with current organizational unit and previous organizational unit. Ideally it should be assigned to one organizational unit. Due to some inconsistency, it is still showing the previous organizational unit.
Example: Ex: User A is replicated from HR to SRM and assigned to Dept A (org unit 1) and later User A is shifted to Dept B (org unit 2) from HR Replication.
Following are the entries observed in relationship tab in BP Transaction code.
Input is BP number assigned to of the user A central person.
User u201CAu201D is employee of
BP number of org unit 1u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to -->1st entry
BP number of org unit 2 u2013 Company(address type) --- xxx(description) u2013valid from --- valid to --> 2nd entry
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh Pithani
Hello Friends,
The root cause of this issue is inconsistency in BUT050, BUT052, ADCP and ADCR tables.
SAP has provided "Zprograms" to remove the inconsistency.
Due this inconsistency, the delivery address is not picking into SC, even though we have maintained the delivery address attribute in org structure.
Thanks & Regards,
Suresh Pithani
Hi Suresh,
We have a similar issue and there were a some OSS notes, but none of them helped.
836353
597475
I even attempted to break the BP,CP and S relationship in PP01 and PPSM transactions, but no avail.
Could you please provide some insight into the Z program that SAP provides. Did it help fix this issue ?
Regards,
Sanjay
User | Count |
---|---|
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.