cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Multilevel ATP Planning with Rules-Based Location Substitution

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

I have a requirement to execute Rules-Based Location Substitution fallowed by a Multilevel Available To Promise (MATP) check at header level.

SO is created at the Depot level, and in case of unavailability of stock, the requirement need to flow to the factory and an MATP check should be carried out.

Present configuration.

Check Mode - Production Type with MATP

Check Instructions -

Product Check - First Step

Active RBA - Checked

Start Production - Availability check first, then produce

Compnts Remain. Reqmt - Create Remaining requirement at Header Level

Conversion Mode (ATPTreeStrct) - Create Several Planned orders

RBA - Made the basic setting and created the Location Substitution rule

Result

If SO is created at Depot - RBA runs the Location Substitution

If SO is created at Factory - MATP runs successfully creating missing part list and ATP tree structure.

Problem is I need to create SO at Depot then RBA runs the Location Substitution fallowed by

Edited by: manu gupta on Jun 29, 2010 8:31 AM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks All,

Maintaining the 'Activity Control' in location substitution will solve the problem.

Regards

Manu

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi Manu,

Is this scenario works with Account assignment as well?

Thanks,

Chandra

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Manu,

Rule based gATP doesnot support this funtionality

It cannot do a mix of MATP & RBA.

Regards

Vaibhav

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thanks Vaibhav,

I have seen MATP with component substitution, thus executing MATP and fallowed by RBA for component substitution.

Hence I was hoping that Location Substitution at header level fallowed by MATP should also be possible.

Please suggest

Regards

Manu

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI Manu,

Rule based gATP doesnot support this funtionality

It cannot do a mix of MATP & RBA at header level.

This is only possible for components.

Regards

Vaibhav