on 06-10-2010 1:54 AM
Hi Gurus,
I have a question about billing split and want to seek your help.
There are 2 deliveries with same Ship-to, and already set to "bill by Ship-to" in customer master data, but system still split them into 2 billing document, I checked in Split Analysi, it says: Split due to different header data.
Can somebody enlighten me how to find out what's the cause of the split?
BTW, the field name in Split Analysis is "Combination criteria in the bi", it seems it's not a complete sentence, how can I see the complete description of field name?
Thanks a lot.
Hi,
Collectvie Billing should have the following criteria.
1. Billing type should be similar
2. Billing date should be same
3. Bill to party should be same
Otherwise Invoice will be splitted automatically.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The problem was solved
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Please check in VTFL the copy control settings which routine are you using it should be at header 003 and at item cat level its should 004 and data vbrk/vbrp should be 001
+Also this OSS notes will help youl :-+
+11162 - Invoice split criteria in billing document+
+36832 - Invoice split in fields from the sales order
Hope this will help you to solve your problem
Regards,
Krishna O
Edited by: Krishna O on Jun 10, 2010 12:45 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Gurus,
Thank you all for replying my question.
I checked VBRK-ZUKRI, and found the information for these 2 billing document is "700+delivery note number", and 700 in VTFL is "Inv.Split (Rec/Div)".
Then I checked the header information for delivery notes of these 2 billing document, they are almost the same (same Payer, same plant, same material, same payment term). The only difference is the delivery date, and one has Planned GI but another is blank.
So I still can't understand why system split them. Could someone give me more hints?
Thanks.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
Please refer the split Analyis in the billing document (VF02) from the menu. This will give you the fields which are
responsible for the split. In addition to that please refer the note-11162 which will give you the reasons for split.
Regards
Govind
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Billing split is done:
Payer
Inco term
Payment term
Actual GI Date from Delivery
Shipping Condition
Account Assignment Group
Exchange rate
different item categories in a sales order ,
different billing document type,
Different referencing document types
Also check your copy control settings in tcode VTFA &, VTFL
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi there,
What do you mean by " set to "bill by Ship-to" in customer master data,"?
In customer master, did you maintain the same name in Bill-to as Ship-to? Check in sales order header partners if ship-to & bill-to are the same. if not, then in copy controls at item level field Data VBRK/VBRP you will have to maintain this logic.
System will allow invoice combination only if billing header data - bill-to, billing date, payment terms etc are same. Check in your orders if all these data is same.
Regards,
Sivanand
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HIIII
check the following...
1. Payer should be
2. Payment Terms should be same
3. check whether the item category is different.
you can analysis the Billing spliting rule in VBRK-ZUKRI " here rule is define"
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.