on 06-07-2010 10:52 PM
Hi All,
I just found job BTCH_RSORAVSH (report /SDF/RSORAVSH) is running hourly on our system. Our TCOLL table contains report RSORAVSH per Note 966309 (Contents of table TCOLL in SAP_BASIS 700).
Is job BTCH_RSORAVSH (report /SDF/RSORAVSH) really necessary? It seems that SAP_COLLECTOR_FOR_PERFMONITOR is running RSORAVSH hourly due to the TCOLL entry, so I'm wondering if anybody recommends one or the other, or both.
All the SAP Notes I viewed were ambiguous on this - Note 549298 from 2002 says RSORAVSH is obsolete and should be deleted from TCOLL, and that /SDF/RSORAVSH was its replacement. However, the more recent Notes say RSORAVSH should be part of TCOLL, but I didn't see any mention that RSORAVSH has now replaced /SDF/RSORAVSH.
Many Thanks,
Ian
Hi,
Read This
Note 564446 - Scheduling of background job BTCH_RSORAVSH
May be note 549298 is applicable for older release only.
But me too in confusion.
Regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi ,
This job will schedule automatic when you activate SDCCN .
no need to worry it will collect the data into TCOLL.
Thanks
Sridhar.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Gagan,
I've gone through Note 564446 (Scheduling of background job BTCH_RSORAVSH) already, but its from 2006...and Note 966309 (Contents of table TCOLL in SAP_BASIS 700) is from 2010 and it says report RSORAVSH should be ran regularly as part of the TCOLL table. So I'm still in a position where I have what seems to be duplicate jobs running.
Does anybody have further insight on this?
Thanks,
Ian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
84 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.