on 05-05-2010 6:03 PM
Experts,
We've been on ECC6.0 EHP3 for some time. Now we just applied the latest support stack and Kernel and we are seeing these errors in SM21
R1 1 No Active Link Found in the Link Table
R5 A > Conversation ID: 00262632
R6 4 > CPI-C function: ?
R1 1 No Active Link Found in the Link Table
R5 A > Conversation ID: 00262632
R6 4 > CPI-C function: CMRCV
R4 7 Delete session 001 after error 004
Q0 G Request (type DIA) cannot be processed
The errors show up in SM21 just like this, all grouped together. We see this grouped like this multiple times per minute. No end users are complaining.
I have not yet been able to find a solution. I have been searching OSS and SDN. I'm not seeing any short dumps in ST22 or any errors in SLG1.
Thanks,
NICK
Hi Nick,
These messages in the system log (SM21) are completely harmless as this is not a problem but just a log of the system's interaction. I had once raised an OSS message with SAP and they had given me the same reply as above.
This kind of error message usually arises if a program wants to send data to the partner program which will be identified via the conversation ID, but this conversation ID is not in the list of active RFC links.
This always happens when one of the two partner programs finishes the conversation and informs the remaining partner program.
Also included in this information is that the gateway already deletes the communication entry in the communication table and conveys the message to the partner program.
This partner program in turn accepts the message but still wants to send a receipt or something else to the program that is already finished Another send after you've received the close of the connection is not allowed.
Therefore the messages you are seeing in the syslog are definitely harmless because even if the send would go through, the receiver is not able to receive the message.
Check if there are any other network related errors in the system. But nothing serious and you can safely ignore this.
Thanks,
Shitij
Edited by: Shitij Bagga on May 5, 2010 10:56 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Shitij,
Thanks for the reply but you are missing my point.
Before the support packs/kernel I didn't see these errors in SM21. Now SM21 logs this every few seconds, non-stop all day. I can't use SM21 if all I see are errors that I'm supposed to ignore.
Something else interesting, I checked the OS log dev_disp and I see this error in that log everytime I see the SM21 error:
SoftCancel request for T183 U20213 M0 received from IC_MAN
SoftCancel request for T115 U20241 M0 received from APPC_SERVER
ERROR => DpRqCheck: T115 in state TM_SLOT_FREE [dpxxdisp.c 7419]
***LOG Q0G=> DpRqBadHandle, bad_req ( DIA) [dpxxdisp.c 5694]
ERROR => BAD REQUEST - Reason: DpRqCheck failed (line 6509): [dpxxdisp.c 5696]
-IN-- sender_id APPC_SERVER tid 115 wp_ca_blk -1 wp_id -1
-IN-- action SEND_TO_WP uid 20241 appc_ca_blk 36 type DIA
-IN-- new_stat NO_CHANGE mode 0 len 80 rq_id 36669
--NICK
We also see this in the corresponding work process log:
M *** ERROR => ThISetCommAttr: bad conv id 20377225, cannot clear addr 0x1 [thxxcpic.c 7301]
M ***LOG R11=> ThCPIC, DpGetCpicCommEntry () [thxxcpic.c 2073]
M ***LOG R5A=> ThCPIC, DpGetCpicCommEntry (20377225) [thxxcpic.c 2078]
M ***LOG R64=> ThCPIC, CPIC-Error ( ?) [thxxcpic.c 2083]
M *** ERROR => no entry in comm table found [thxxcpic.c 2088]
M *** ERROR => appc_index/conv_id/tid/uid/mode: -1/20377225/101/25952/0 [thxxcpic.c 2088]
M *** ERROR => bad index: -1 [thxxcpic.c 2089]
M ***LOG R11=> ThCPIC, DpGetCpicCommEntry () [thxxcpic.c 2073]
M ***LOG R5A=> ThCPIC, DpGetCpicCommEntry (20377225) [thxxcpic.c 2078]
M ***LOG R64=> ThCPIC, CPIC-Error ( CMRCV) [thxxcpic.c 2083]
M *** ERROR => no entry in comm table found [thxxcpic.c 2088]
M *** ERROR => appc_index/conv_id/tid/uid/mode: -1/20377225/101/25952/0 [thxxcpic.c 2088]
M *** ERROR => bad index: -1 [thxxcpic.c 2089]
M ThJmpToCaller: cpic rc 20 outside dynp
M ***LOG R47=> ThResFree, delete (001004) [thxxmode.c 1443]
--NICk
new kernel is called dw_256-20000978.sar
This resolved the issue
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
81 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.