cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Renumeration Statement Issue

former_member48927
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello All,

I am facing an issue with renumeration statement. For certain custom wage types, during retro scenario, the statement shows wrong amount. However, if i am viewing this statement using pc00_m99_cedt with option of retro printed in separate pages (A, X etc) the amount is shown correctly? What am i missing here?

Thanks!

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello Hains , as per my knowledge - pc00_m99_cedt will just display you the results which are there in cluster table. pc00_m99_clstr unless you do retro calculations and update the cluster table - it will not be get updated -what u say ?

former_member48927
Participant
0 Kudos

Statement picks values from RT table. But the issue is it is showing different values while using different combinations of statement output which is confusing. This only happens during retro.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Change Print retroactive runs from X to L and see

former_member48927
Participant
0 Kudos

Thanks Jay. Whenever, im displaying all wage types in one page, there is error in amount. If the display of wage types is in different pages for retro periods, the amount is shown correctly.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hans,

If possible please se nd me screenshots - check my business card - i hope i will understand better on the screenshots

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi,

you should check your Split indicators in Display Groups (windows section in PE51).

It causes some troubles in retroactive runs.

Regards

former_member48927
Participant
0 Kudos

Hello!

In pc00_m99_cedt, if Layout of retroactive runs is J or 😧 All values are correct

When Layout of retroactive runs changed to A or S, all retro wage type values are 24% higher than actuals.

Any suggestions?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

could you please indicate following details so i can better understand your issue?

- WT are supposed are supposed to be printed on payslip

with retro period indicated on form?

summarized?

If you have * or D in your DSplit indicator in PE51 for your WT it won`y change number for WT, neither Rate it will only summarize amounts from retro periods + in period that you are. So the results can look weird.

Could you please indicate more details or ideally send me screen shoots from your PE51 and your payslip?

Regards

former_member48927
Participant
0 Kudos

Thanks T. Please find details

with retro period indicated on form? Yes, currently showing retro periods (it shows wrong periods when printing in A or S combination)

summarized? No

If you have * or D in your DSplit indicator in PE51 for your WT: Yes, * in D-split

Tried removing the * and other combinations.

(unable to locate email in ur business card)