on 04-09-2010 11:16 AM
Dear experts,
What is the best practice regarding risk maintenance workflow. Should it be facilitated on GRC Dev? Then regular (manual) export/import to GRC Prod to keep them both in sync?
Kind Regards,
Vit
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I would highly recommend to make your unit testing for WF in D/Q so you would have to transport/export them from D to Q to P.
Otherwise you will get WF issues in production you havent been aware of yet
HTH
Nesimi
Hi Nesimi,
I know all workflows should be tested before exported to prod. My question was regarding the approval workflow for maintaining the rulset in RAR.
A: Should the WF reside and update the ruleset on D/Q. Then export the rulset changes to Prod to keep the two rulsets in sync.
or
B: Should the WF reside and update the ruleset on Prod. Then export the rulset changes to D/Q to keep the two rulsets in sync.
C: WF resides and update the ruleset on Prod. As long as all evidence is on Prod, it is not critical that D/Q ruleset is in sync.
Kind regards,
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.