on 04-06-2010 12:33 AM
Hi all,
HR is getting the following error message when they run payroll: "No earmarked funds found for external document XXXX" (Message no. RE154).
Here is the explanation for this message: "You want to post a document which references earmarked funds with the external document number XXXX. The system could not find these earmarked funds."
The document number that the message refers to is neither a payroll doc number or a funds reservation/commitment document number (based on the document number range).
Has anyone seen this message before? Any thoughts?
Thanks in advance.
R
Dear colleague,
The reason could be:
In the variant for the data collection report
you use a data selection period , for example:
07/01/06 to 06/30/07
for method 'DAta from Payroll (PAYR)'
However, if the commitment interval is for example, 01/01/08 to 06/30/2008
Thats why no data are collected, and thats the reason for the message.
Please review the data selection period for the variant .
Let me know if this helps.
Regards, Noemí
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
According your error description, please check this note to help you.
734494 Error in acct assignment validation in
Regards,
JLB
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Roger,
Let me know if you have these notes in your system:
1124767 Cmmt processor: Error message RE 154 during cmmt creation
1125561 Commitment processor: RHRFPM_ERLK does not reconcil
if they do not help, let me know your current release/sp levels so that we can see if any other note is helpful.
Mar
Hi Mar,
Our release for HR is 0027, which I am told is much more advanced than what your first note (1124767) refers to. Also, when we tried through SNOTE, it says that 'this cannot be implemented'. Going by this we are thinking that all corrections spelled out in this note are already in. Would you agree? Or do you think we should just go ahead and try implementing this note?
If you have any other notes that you think may be relevant to this issue?
Please let us know.
I appreciate your effort in trying to resolve this.
Thanks.
User | Count |
---|---|
100 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
6 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.