on 03-08-2010 8:47 PM
Hi,
I have to copy a mandant from production to dev
It failed, because some tables are missing locally
(missing remote is not a problem no ?)
I can drop the remote table (validated by dev)
I did it with SE14 but the table is still seen by RFC Comparison
How can I fix that ?
Thanks in advance
Hi my friend
Remote client copy requires strictly consistent table structure between source and target client. You are not able to proceed without correcting the inconsistency. The comparison reults usually tells which field missing in which table and which requests are involved, where you could find the owner of this request is. Then go talk to him/her, see how to proceed either have it transport it into target client or delete it in the source client to have them in a consistent state.
Regards,
Effan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
HI Effan,
Thanks for your answer.
when I did an RFC comparison
some tables are missing locally and some are missing remotely
- missing remotely: table1, table2
I can drop this tables accordingly the developpers
I dropped tables table1 and table2 with SE14
but still there with RFC Comparison, something I missed ?
- missing locally: table3, table4
I can drop this tables accordingly the developpers
how can I drop this table cleanly ?
I am not very familiar with SAP, sorry for that
Thanks for your help
There are several ways to get rid of table, whether it's transparent or cluster. But for data consistency, I strongly suggest you to forward the RFC comparison result to developers, and have them get two systems sync for you. Deleting in SE14 directly could cause other inconsistency.
Regards,
Effan
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.