cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

R3TRFUGRV69A was repaired in this system

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Gurus,

I am facing an issue while applying support packs at test import and sp are abarted.

Please let me know how to go ahead.

Error log :

R3TRFUGRV69A was repaired in this system

Table TIVBE44 is not in nametab

Table TIVBEOBJ is not in nametab

Table TIVBECTYP is not in nametab

Table TIVBECTYPT is not in nametab

Table TIVBEKOFI is not in nametab

Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===

Thanks and rgds

VJ

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

former_member185239
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Vijay,

Note 695195 - Activation process fails for the table pool

More over , try to run the test import in dialog mode and it will show you the objects which are getting locked.

With Regards

Ashutosh Chaturvedi

paul_power
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi VJ,

The error message <object>was repaired in this system always due to

this object are included in transport requests that have not been

released yet.

In order to solve the incidence you must release the transport requests.

Please goto SE03->Display repaired objects->then double click on the

object->button 'Lock overview'->you will see the request in which the

object is repaired.

Then contact the owner of the request to release the request, after

that, try to import again.

Below two Notes are for your reference.

42379 SPAM aborts at step TEST_IMPORT

9949 Error during test import: object was repaired

Check if the object is contained in an unreleased repair by searching

for the object in table TLOCK (SE16).

If there is an entry in table TLOCK then field TKORR will contain the

unreleased repair. Release the repair (SE01) which will remove the

repair flag.

After resolving this, can you proceed or are you still blocked by the <x> does not exist in nametab.

Regards,

Paul

Former Member
0 Kudos

Paul,

FYI, we had the exact same problem, but your solution worked perfectly.

Thanks,

Janick Pauwels

Delaware Consulting

paul_power
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Janick,

Glad to be of some help

Best regards,

Paul

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Paul,

i have the same issue... but the TLOCK table is empty as well as i have unlocked all relevant TR's using SE03.. but with no luck...

Regards

Chris

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi!

I tried your solution but it didn't work, it's still complaining objet was repaired and it wasn't transported...

Former Member
0 Kudos

this should fix your problem , as recommended by Paul above.

In order to solve the incidence you must release the transport requests.        

Please goto SE03->Display repaired objects->then double click on the            

object->button 'Lock overview'->you will see the request in which the           

object is repaired.

Regards

Amit Padmawar

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Amit,

I read what Paul wrote, and as I said, I already tried it and it didn't work

0 Kudos

Hi Paul,

We faced the similar problem while upgrade and tried your solution.

It worked perfectly.

Thank you so much!

Regards,

Dhaneshwari Pareek

saudshaikh
Explorer
0 Kudos

Paul Power's reply is helpful for me as well. TLOCK was having the entry of error object with the Transport Request locking it.

Thanks & Regards,

Saud

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello Vijay, can you please check the components you are patching have all the pre-requisites met as you are doing a test run first you can cancel it.

Also, can you please paste you system and system components information to have furhter analysis on this.

like ECC or BW and components aba, basis, bw.

Regards, Amber S | ITL

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Amber,

Existing Sp

SAP_ABA 640 0019 SAPKA64019

SAP_BASIS 640 0019 SAPKB64019

SAP_BW 350 0019 SAPKW35019

SAP_APPL 500 0011 SAPKH50011

SAP_HR 500 0014 SAPKE50014

I am facing the TEST_IMPORT error when I tried to apply SAP_APPL SAPKH50012.

Before that i have successfully applied SAP_BASIS SAPKB64019 AND SAP_ABAP SAPKA64019.

Thanks

VJ

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Thank Vijay for the details, can you go to spam tcode. left side display all suport packages, just expoand this component SAPKH50012 and check if all prerequite componenets have been applied ?

let me know the out come

Regards, Amber S | ITL

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Also, i t seems before support patch apllication the objects in this R3TRFUGRV69A have been changed by Abap team can you check and open those objects and see if any customization involved from abapp ?

Regards, Amber S | ITL

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Amber,

I have checked all prerequite componenets and all are applied.

Error log:

Test import

Transport request : SAPKH50012

System : DEV

tp path : tp

Version and release: 340.16.31 640

640

000

R3TRFUGRV69A was repaired in this system

Table TIVBE44 is not in nametab

Table TIVBEOBJ is not in nametab

Table TIVBECTYP is not in nametab

Table TIVBECTYPT is not in nametab

Table TIVBEKOFI is not in nametab

0 0

Test import

End date and time : 20100307125525

52864 153088

COMMIT (63571866).

63571866 bytes read.

Transport overhead 13.4 %.

Data compressed to 13.1 %.

Duration: 10 sec (6357186 bytes/sec).

0 0

[dev trc ,00000] Sun Mar 07 12:55:24 2010 10154082 10.154082

[dev trc ,00000] Disconnecting from ALL connections: 10 10.154092

[dev trc ,00000] Disconnecting from connection 0 ... 24 10.154116

[dev trc ,00000] Close user session (con_hdl=0,svchp=000000000030C278,usrhp=0000000000305AC8)

899 10.155015

[dev trc ,00000] Detaching from DB Server (con_hdl=0,svchp=000000000030C278,srvhp=00000000062040E8)

857 10.155872

[dev trc ,00000] Now I'm disconnected from ORACLE 1896 10.157768

[dev trc ,00000] Disconnected from connection 0 22 10.157790

[dev trc ,00000] statistics db_con_commit (com_total=3, com_tx=3)

13 10.157803

[dev trc ,00000] statistics db_con_rollback (roll_total=0, roll_tx=0)

12 10.157815

Disconnected from database.

End of Transport (0008).

date&time: 07.03.2010 - 12:55:24

5 warnings occured.

1 error occured.

Test import

End date and time : 20100307125525

Ended with return code: ===> 8 <===

Thanks rgds

VJ

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Amber,

How to identify these objects in this R3TRFUGRV69A ??

Rgds

VJ

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Vijay, The standard object V69A has been changed prior to support patch implementaion it seems from Devlopment team can you please invovle you dev/abap team to have a look into this Function group - FUGRV69A ?

R3TRFUGRV69A

R3TR - Full Object

FUGR - Function Group

V69A - Is the object.

Regards, Amber S | ITL

Edited by: Amber S on Mar 8, 2010 12:16 PM

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Also, Vijay just to have a try can yopu please do this in you SPAM tcode and try to proceed ?

Extras > ignore test import errors > and then try if it proceeds ?

Let me know the outcome.

    • As this is RC = 8 we can try ignoring the test import errors. **

Regards, Amber S | ITL

Edited by: Amber S on Mar 8, 2010 12:35 PM

Former Member
0 Kudos

Amber,

I tried in SPAM tcode and try to proceed ?

Extras > ignore test import errors > and then try if it proceeds ?

But still the same issue.

Rgds

vJ