cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

GUID of SWCV is not matching with SWCV in ESR(IR).

former_member182418
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Experts,

I have developed two interface under same existing SWCV of existing interface.

These two interfcae are under separate Namsapace declared into SWCV of existing Interface.

Now we need to export the ID and IR objects to deploy the Interfaces in Client enviornment.

I am facing one problem now. Earlier Client was on 7.0 now they have upgraded to 7.1.

We have done the .tpz deployment into their server. but now the GUID of SWCV is changed by imported .tpz file.

During import at client side conflict occurs. we settled the conflict.

SWCV of SLD 's GUID is not mached wih IR SWCV's GUID - this message is coming when we check with tool->check SLD value.

Please give suggestion.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

VijayKonam
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

May be this is because, at your client they could have created the SWC in SLD afresh. They should have actually imported the SLD content from 7.0 and exported in to their 7.1 SLD.

If you think the development copy that you have and what needs to be sent to the client are same, you might want export your SLD content along with IR content and import at client system. But be aware that, you would have to delete the existing IR objects and SLD SWC entries.

VJ

former_member182418
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Vijaya,

In client's Server one of the Interface is already in use and In Production System it is working.

We have developed additional two Interface under same SWCV under respective namesapaces.

Th .tpz we have to deployed is the delta developemnt only. but now when we have deployed this .tpz in their enviornment, the Conflict occcurs , we have settled this conflict and additional Interface's IR objects are imported.

Now we are able to see all objects under respective namesapace.

Problem is now of SWCV's GUID is overwitten by import. it showing our sever 's SWCV's GUID.

So Client SLD is not Matched with SWCV of IR.

Please suggest in this context.