Application Development Discussions
Join the discussions or start your own on all things application development, including tools and APIs, programming models, and keeping your skills sharp.
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Combining I_AUART in IW33 and IW31 leads to a issue

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello,

When i have 2 roles:

1: A display role for ordertypes: YC01, YC02 and YC03

2: A edit role for ordertypes: YC02

I would like to combine these role to one composite role and assign this to one user

so that he can view the three ordertypes and create/edit only

ordertypes YC02.

When i edit object I_AUART, field: AFART the problem is using the same

object in same roles the display role overrules. In this way i can

create also the YC03 ordertypes.

I have try to create a own class, this did not solved the issue. Can

you please give me tips or a solution?

With kind regards,

Marc van 't Hooft

3 REPLIES 3

Former Member
0 Kudos

you can only use this to distinguish between maintenance planning plant

you can not seperate between transactions

0 Kudos

This means that it's only possible to view, edit and create the ordertypes or to do nothing? It doesn't seem logic to me that the scenario i describe is not possible.

Is there another way to furfill this scenario?

0 Kudos

Hi,

it looks like PM authorization objects does not allow you to define various activities for different order types. Fortunately, you can use BADI IWO1_ORDER_BADI to implement additional specific authorization checks. So you can define your own authorization object.

Cheers