02-05-2010 4:25 PM
Hi Experts,
Problem description:
For billing documents (After executing mass transaction EA27) in some documents the due date(DFKKOPFAEDN) is same as the posting date(DFFKOPBUDAT) and also in some cases its +30 days than the posting date of document. Accroding to the standard function ISU_DUE_DATE_DETERMINE and table entries TE052 (Payment terms) and T052 it should be + 14 days from posting date.
The client expects the due date to be 14 days later then the posting date. So we have to check why the due date is +0 days(i.e. same as the posting date) or +30 days from posting date, generally it should be +14 days later then posting date.
Please let me know your suggestions/comments.
Thanks in advance.
Pruthviraj.
02-10-2010 3:49 PM
Hi,
For the case that due date is +30 and your payment condition settings are OK, I would check the user exit R417 (ISU_SAMPLE_R417) for the managing of the due dates. For the another case +0 one reason can be that the amount of the document is less then 0. In this case is the due date = posting date.
I hope my suggestion will help you.
Vlado
02-10-2010 3:49 PM
Hi,
For the case that due date is +30 and your payment condition settings are OK, I would check the user exit R417 (ISU_SAMPLE_R417) for the managing of the due dates. For the another case +0 one reason can be that the amount of the document is less then 0. In this case is the due date = posting date.
I hope my suggestion will help you.
Vlado
02-11-2010 9:20 AM