cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Problem Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi to All..

I'm facing a problem in one scenario File to Idoc .. I got this problem

"Unable to convert the sender service to an ALE logical system" in pipeline Call Adapter.

I check this blog but the problem persist . /people/michal.krawczyk2/blog/2005/03/29/xi-error--unable-to-convert-the-sender-service-to-an-ale-logical-system

Also I have another scenario in other Software Component Version SCW and the Idoc works correctly..

I wonder if I miss something

this the trace

<Trace level="1" type="T">----


</Trace>

- <Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_IDX_IDOC_SERVICE-ENTER_PLSRV">

<Trace level="1" type="T">Pipeline Service ID: PLSRV_CALL_ADAPTER</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="T">Get Information from IS-Header Objekt</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="T">Get Information from SD-IDoc-Endpoint</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender and Receiver after Header-Mapping</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="T">Sender service Sys_XXX</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="T">Receiver service Sys_EDV_XXX</Trace>

</Trace>

</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_LOG_TO_PERSIST" />

<Trace level="1" type="System_Error">Error exception return from pipeline processing!</Trace>

<Trace level="1" type="B" name="CL_XMS_MAIN-WRITE_MESSAGE_TO_PERSIST" />

Edited by: Luis Ortiz on Jan 25, 2010 3:37 PM

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

MichalKrawczyk
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

open your receiver agreement and select header mapping - Sender service

choose your PI's business system

activate and run

Regards,

Michal Krawczyk

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Micheal

Thanks for your answer.

Now it's work...i have another question Why do I have set this parameter?

Thanks

MichalKrawczyk
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

in order to use only one logical system (PI's) in we20 in ECC and not as many as you have sender systems

Regards,

Michal Krawczyk

Answers (0)