cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

relation between UTXJ AND JR1

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello friends,

my client is US is using taxusj tax procedure in FI and in SD rvaa001 pricing procedure. ship-to is liable for tax and material is liable for tax.when creating sales order UTXJ is zero in item condition and JR1 is triggering in item conditions in order. In FTXP tax rate is maintained for JR1.

But my question is when in ship-to UTXJ is liable for tax but it is not triggerring in order, why JR1 is triggering tax percent?

someone help me out.

regards,

seetaram

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Lakshmipathi
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Check in VK12 for which condition type, tax code is maintained. In normal cases, for UTXJ, tax code should have been maintained but from your comments, it seems, tax code has not been maintained in VK11.

thanks

G. Lakshmipathi

Former Member
0 Kudos

thank you friend for your response, currently I am investigating on this issue.

regards,

seetaram

Former Member
0 Kudos

thank you friend for your advice.Presently they put the issue on holding.

regards,

Seetaram