on 01-18-2010 9:50 PM
HI all,
We are in SCM 4.0. We consider past 36 months of demand to foreacst for next 24 months. In the last 6 months we had a huge spikes in the demand due to unexpected orders and now the demand is stable. I am looking for the ways to ignore the laast 6 months of huge demand for the future forecasting as it will have great impact on our future numbers.
Couple of options we are looking at to reduce the effect are:
1. Using Outlier functionality with various sigma values
2. Trying out with Trend Damping Profile and/or History damping profiles
However, we are looking for the possible ways to ignore the last 6 monhs demand completely
Your thoughts are well appreciated.
Thanks,
Sai
Hello Sai,
There are multiple ways to tackle your issue:
1.Maintain fixed dates in History horizon in master forecast profile
2.Maintain an offset of 6 months in history horizon in master fcst profile
3.Perform manual Sales history adjustments for last 6 months
I would have preferred option 3 since at any point of time you will consider 36 months of past history for stat fcst generation.
Thanks,Bopanna
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
One radical approach can be using Promotions.
See /people/somnath.manna/blog/2009/05/29/demand-forecasting-in-tough-times for further details.
Hope this helps.
Somnath
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
One other option would be to use outlier correction as you suggested, but in conjunction with a Historical Value Markings profile. In that profile you would specify only those 6 months where your data is problematic. Thus the outlier correction would correct only these 6 months. Use a low sigma value, so that outlier correction is sensitive.
Kind regards,
Zoltan Biro.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
7 | |
4 | |
3 | |
2 | |
2 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 | |
1 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.