on 01-05-2010 12:06 PM
Hi All,
Its ECC 6.0 on HP-UNIX and oracle 10g
I have client 100,200 ,300 and 400
Now whn I import any request frm client 100 to 200 using SCC1 its gets imported in all the clients.
Any idea why it is hapenning ????
Regards
Why you are assuming that request has imported into all the avaialble clients?
by watching request no in all the clients.......you can see the request no in any client in one system it doesn't mean that request has imported into all the clients.
If it is an actual situation just check the first screen of SCC1...there target client should be your optional(not * or not in disable mode).
Regards,
Nick Loy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Nick is correct. The transportrequest itself is clientindependent
and therefore the request it is visible in all clients. In general there is a restriction,
that a request can only be modified in the client where it has been created,
but there are options inside the transport tools to change that.
But: SCC1 is NOT considered to be a transport, because it can
be used on OPEN requests. This means, whatever you do with
SCC1 does not ensure a consistent and reproducable status.
It will always do a select on the source tables at the time of
the SCC1 execution, no matter if the request is still open or
has been released three years ago (in this case, the result will
most likely have nothing to do with the content of the trasportdatafile
that has been exported three years ago).
A valid purpose to use SCC1 is to pre-test customizing transports
that are to be released soon. I.E in a scenario like
DEV-100 : customizing master
DEV-200 : customizing pre-test
QAS-100 : QA master
You can SCC1 your open transport again and again from
DEV-100 to DEV-200 until the result satisfies. Then you release it
and import it to DEV-200 AND QAS-100 and never use SCC1
with this request again.
Volker
Hi Volker,
Yes, Nick has made right pt that Request no. will be visible is all the clients on same H/W.
Infact my client was in assumption that its being copied is all the clients whereas its just the presence(as said by Nike)
I was aware of this fact but it didnt strike me when my client explained the problem and later I realised it after going thru Nike's statement.
Anyway many thansk to all involved-in.
Regards
No need to import cross-client/workbench request into other clients in same system---This is fine
but for better understanding paste the logs of SCC1 and also recheck the same from your side too.
Regards
Nick Loy
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Do you have a scheduled import at the STMS level? Have you checked the logs within SCC1?
Like Eric mentioned, if you are transporting workbench requests then objects are already in 200.
J. Haynes
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Nick : SCC1 log just says copied succesully.
Eric : I think SCC1 is actually meant for copying customizing request on same server in different client.
And in my case I think when we run SCC1, it replects req. no. in all the available clients but the effect only takes place in the target client. ( Im not sure but I think so)
Wht you say Eric ????
if your transport contains client INdependant objects, this is completely normal...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
88 | |
23 | |
11 | |
9 | |
8 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.