on 12-15-2009 1:36 PM
Hello everyone,
I know there are a lot of topics regarding this issue, but I´ve been through all of them and still I have the same 'old' error:
"Error in processing caused by: com.sap.aii.adapter.rfc.afcommunication.RfcAFWException: senderAgreement not found: lookup of binding via CPA-cache failed for AdapterType RFC, AdapterNS http://sap.com/xi/XI/System, direction INBOUND, fromParty '*', fromService 'DR1', toParty '', toService '', interface 'ZFHR_ANIVESARIANTES', NS 'urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions' for channel 'RFC_SENDER' (channelId b736e68993f1317db4155af72b16f005)"
Where:
DR1 is the name of the Business System that points to SAP R3 (origin of the RFC)
ZFHR_ANIVESARIANTES is the name of the RFC from R3
RFC_SENDER is the name of my channel type RFC sender
I´ve already done:
1 - Cache full refresh
2 - Check and recheck my SM59 configuration
3 - Make sure there is a Sender Agreement
4 - Checked the SAP Notes related to this issue
This is suppose to be a simple RFC to PI (Async) cenario, but I´ve been stuck on this issue for the past 12hrs straight.
Is there anyone that can help me on that?
One thing that I´ve notice, is that in my RFC sender CC, there is only the option for me to select "Central Adapter Engine" under "Adapter Engine". There is no option for me to chose "Integration Server". - just thought I should point this out, since all the Blogs I´ve seen point to "Integration Server".
Please, I would realli appreciate some help!
Ricardo Sancio Lóra
Brazil
1) You seem to have not maintained Adapter Specific Identifiers properly for the Business System in ID.
Check Q15 of this SAP note: https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/730870
From the above SAP Note:
Q 15: Whats wrong when the error message "lookup of alternativeServiceIdentifier via CPA-cache failed" shows up while sending a RFC call to the RFC Adapter?
2) Hope that the Business System that you have defined in the SLD is pointing to the desired SAP system from which you are receiving the RFC message.
3) Also ensure that your cache is up-to-date.
Regards,
Abhishek.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This issue seems to with your Business System. While doing sender agrement it is not recognizing your BS.
Note, BS is case sensitive, so make sure when you created in SLD it should be same as maintained in R3. Rest everything Abhishek has told you by SAP note.
One more thing after your update the SLD, "Clear SLD Data Cache" from menu "Environment" first in ID before you to for next try.
Regards,
Sarvesh
Sarvesh,
The creation of the BS was done by my BASIS team (which sometimes we love and sometimes we hate).
How can I make sure that my BS was created correctly (like u said: "the same as maintained in R3")?
As far as I can see, the BS config is like this:
1 - Name: DR1
2 - Role: Application System
3 - Related integration Server: none
4 - Technical System: DR1 on sapdr1
5 - Client: 210 of DR1
6 - Logical System Name: DR1CLNT210
7 - Configuration URL: blank
BTW, I did the "Clear SLD data cache" and still nothing new.
Thanks!
Ricardo
Hi Ricardo,
Try this too...
Delete the business system & sender agreement from Directory and re-import Business system, then re-create sender agreement
Also check these (I read in one of the thread, forgot which one)
1) Check on to the stacktrace in
<local drive>:\usr\sap\XXX\YYY\j2ee\cluster\server0\log
2) Just try re-starting the server
3) Tcode-SU01 Check any LOCK.
4) Check the TABALE SPACE
5) Try re starting Java Stack
6) check note number 804124
Updated
Check these threads:
Regards
Suraj
Hi
Try to find the sender agreement using Find option in Integration Directory with the following option
Sender
Communication Party = <blank>
Communication Component = DR1
Interface = ZFHR_ANIVESARIANTES
Namespace = urn:sap-com:document:sap:rfc:functions
Also the Adapter Engine will be Central Adapter Engine
Regards
Suraj
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.