on 11-03-2009 12:00 PM
Hi
I encountered a problem with idoc messages going from SAP to integration process in PI system.
It was sent 6 idocs at the same time. Four of them went into the correct integration process, while two of them went into a different integration process and therefore failed.
How it looked in monitoring:
Msg1 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPWrong
Msg2 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPCorrect
Msg3 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPCorrect
Msg4 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPCorrect
Msg5 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPWrong
Msg6 -> Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPCorrect
Setup is correct, the message is set to go to IPCorrect. Why does two messages go to wrong integration process? Does this have something to do with them being sent at the same time?
regards Marianne
Did u have any conditional Rx determination?? Based on those conditions, it would have been routed to different Integration processes.
Regards,
Siva Maranani
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Marianne,
>>Sender = SAP -> SenderService = SS1 -> ReceiverService = IPWrong
Do you have a receiver determination in Configuration with the above systems??? You can use the find option of Integration Directory.
If foudn a combination and if you don't require this then delete it and test your interface again!!!
Regards
Suraj
Hi Suraj
I have looked all over too see if this was the case, but I haven't found anything. It looks to me that when these idocs are sent at the same time, PI somehow makes a mistake and uses a different Integration Process as the receiver.
The "wrong" integration process was used at the same time, but for a different message of course...Could it be some mix-up in the processing here, that PI thought it was supposed to use IPWrong instead of IPRight and if so, is it possible to avoid that somehow..?
regards Marianne
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.