cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

GRC AC- Workflow in CUP

yudittzruya
Participant
0 Kudos

Dear All,

We encountered an issue with one of our customers regarding the definition of WFu2019s path.

The customer has a WF : START -> risk manager -> business manager 1 -> business manager 2 (**) -> auth. Manager -> FINISH

(**) u2013 The second approval of business manager is needed only in the case where the Functional area of the role is not the same of the one of the Request.

We thought about defining CAD approvers for every combination of Role Functional Area & Request Functional Area (for the cases they are not the same).

The problem is that in the case where both is the same, this stage is not needed at all. So we thought about using an escape rout u2013 but then it will be relevant for all WFs, and this is not what we want.

Do you have any idea how to deal with this situation ?

Thanks

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Yudit,

Unfortunately CUP does not have the sort of functional logic you require in your workflow.

You will have to try another angle to fulfill the business requirement.

Hope this helps.

Rgds,

Prevo.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Yudit,

I don't think you will be able to replicate this scenarion in CUP. CUP doesn't have any condition related functional area using which you can set detour, fork or escape route so I highly doubt that you can make the workflow work this way.

Regards,

Alpesh