cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Transport Job Issue - Approval forward job - QAS to PRD

0 Kudos

Hi,

We are facing issue with the approval transport job that runs with program RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS.

The approved request are not getting forwarded from QAS to PRD. The job is in active status until we cancel it manually.

The corresponding batch work process is in "stopped" status with reason as 'RFC"

Can someone help us on this issue?

Regards,

Ashwin

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (2)

Answers (2)

0 Kudos

Dear All,

Issue was resolved after distributing the transport path, no concrete root cause could be found.

Thanks,

Aswin

former_member198270
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Ashwin, Can you please re run the job and update us ?

Regards, Amber S

0 Kudos

Hi Amber,

Thanks for your suggestion.

Now, the job is getting cancelled with the following log,

Job started

Step 001 started (program RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS, variant &0000000000001, user ID **

Could not find delivery routes for client in system VIR

Job cancelled after system exception ERROR_MESSAGE

Let me know if you can help.

Thanks,

Ashwin

0 Kudos

Hi ,

We faced a similar issue in our landscape.

Our transport path looks as below

Dev --> Virtual system --> after approval in STMS_QA --> QAS

After approving the transport in STMS_QA , we were not able to see the transport in QAS. The RSTMS_DIST_APPROVED_REQUESTS job failed telling 'Could not find delivery route for client(000) in (virtual system name)'.

When we checked the virtual system buffer, we found a transport for client 000. Yet , our delivery route was configured only for client 100. So the job was failing to forward any transport as it couldn't find any delivery route for client 000 transport. We deleted the 000 client transport from the buffer and rescheduled the job. Then the trasnport requests were moving to the subsequent buffers successfully.

Thanks,

Kasi Gupta

0 Kudos

Hi Kasi,

Thanks for the update and providing another solution in the thread.

Regards,

Aswin