cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

about interface mapping

Former Member
0 Kudos

about interface mapping.

if source message is identic with target message, well then, is it required to specify a mapping program in interface mapping?

i find out ,sometimes YES,sometimes NO.

can anybody explain to this?

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member187339
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hello joy,

It you are using same name for message type (and they are having the same structure and name space) and message interface, then no IR is required. And hence no interface and message mapping is required

>>same message type in source and target?

But if Message interface name is different, then you need operation mapping (even though they use the same message types.

Also if message type is different then message mapping is required

Also check this thread:

Regards

Suraj

Answers (3)

Answers (3)

Former Member
0 Kudos

If source and target message are identical then no need of interface mapping. if not you will need them.

Regards,

Pavan

Former Member
0 Kudos

if source message is identic with target message, well then, is it required to specify a mapping program in interface mapping?

no need of interface mapping

Explaination

if the message interface (outbound and inbound )refer to the same message type (say MT_Test) then no need of Interface mapping

if they refer to different message type then you require Interface mapping even if the those two message type are created using the same Data type

former_member200962
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

If the Target-Data content/ format is different than the one of the Source-Data content/ format then mapping is required....no matter if the structure is the same or not.

Some correction:

You dont design a mapping program & Interface mapping if the Source & target resemble each other in structure and data format

REgards,

Abhishek.

Edited by: abhishek salvi on Sep 18, 2009 4:21 PM