on 09-02-2009 11:11 AM
Dear Experts,
After completing our development, we transported all the objects from Dev System to QA System.
But after transporting it was found out that Data Objects and Backend Adapters Status is showing Red i.e status is being marked as "Generation Failed".
Can anyone throw please explain why this odd behaviour?
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Hi,
You can check if all the entries in DOE_MASS_ACTGEN queue (TR: SMQ2) has executed successfully or not.
If there is an entry with SYSFAIL, you can execute the entry again.
Regards,
Ramanath
Edited by: Ramanath Kulkarni on Sep 2, 2009 12:21 PM
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Ramanath,
One possible reason I found was Destination was missing. Is that why generation failed?
We are now retransporting the ABAP objects again from Dev TO QA.
And one more thing, if we execute DOE_MASS_ACTGEN, will it generate new GUIDs for SWCV and Data Objects? If yes then it will be trouble for our team. Can you please throw light on this also?
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Hi Gopal,
Re-transporting of the design time objects is not needed. You can simply execute the queue (if it is stuck)
Also as mentioned by Rohit, if your system (QA) is newly setup, you need to configure it for correct functionality using SDOE_SR.
You can also maintain the RFC destinations using the Admin portal and then execute the queue entries in SYSFAIL.
Regards,
Ramanath.
Hi Rohit,
Thanks for input. We have already started retransport. Once retransport is done, we will implement what Ramanath and you have suggested.
Hi Ramanath,
I will do the same as suggested by you.
Will close the thread once issue gets resolved.
Thanks for input.
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Edited by: Gopal on Sep 2, 2009 4:52 PM
Hi Ramanath/Rohit,
Still the same error. I ran SDOE_SR and checked entries in SMQ2. There was no SYSFAIL entries. But still Data objects status is being shown as error. And Backend Adapter status are being shown as "Generation Failed".
Can you please provide any other hint?
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Hi Rohit,
I think regenerating will create problem for us as it will create a new GUID for SWCV and Data Objects. Am i right in thinking so? In that case client side development will go for a toss and separate sda will have to be created to run code on QA system which is not at all be liked by our client.
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Hi Gopal,
Generation will not create GUID for the SWCV or data object. Hence no need to worry about the application developed already for the mobile clients.
Regarding the generation error, as mentioned by Dhana, looks like you have not specified the backend keys fields in your data object node.
Kindly check the same.
Regards,
Ramanath.
Hi Dhanasekhar,
Honestly speaking, I am on Java Development side and I am not expert in handling middleware. MIddleware expert has ben relieved from the client side and now I am handling the implementation.
So can you please explain me on how exactly I have to check?
Also, on DOE Development server things are working fine and there is no error. All Data Objects and backend adapters are in status "Green". Objects got transported from Dev Server to QA server
Shall I raise OSS on this issue so that SAP Labs can look into the system and convey me where am I may going wrong?
Thanks and Regards,
Gopal
Edited by: Gopal on Sep 3, 2009 10:02 AM
Hi
will start with the doubt regarding guid: as mentioned above the regeneration will not change the GUIDs. Regeneration does not affect the data object defition, and unless there is change in definition guids are not changed.
To check the data object model in middleware : Need to go to doe workbench using transaction sdoe_wb. In that select the SWCV relevant for you, and then navigate to your data object. Once on the nodes corresponding your data object, you can check the attributes for the node's fields. Check whether the BEKey and BEField checkbox are checked or not.
As there is syntax error, the generation has not gone through successfully. After correcting the model and actiavtion, the generation should go fine.
regards
pradeep
User | Count |
---|---|
93 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.