on 08-31-2009 6:49 AM
Hi Gurus
I would like to know the constraints of implementing CHARM during the implementation phase of the project.
I am aware that, charm functionality is best suitable for post go live change tracking tool and it is not recommended during the implementation phase. But I would like to know the reasons behind not recommending CHARM during implementation phase.
Please provide your valuable inputs.
Thanks.
Thanks Kriti and Jagan for your valuable inputs.
Jagan,
So, by making Solution Manager as the domain controller and keeping some other domain cotroller as the back up, we can control the entire transport operations using Solution Manager.I suppose,as a prerequisite, we need to link up the domain controller of solution manager and other domain controllers in the landscape . Please correct me if i am wrong.
Also, could please list out any specific advantage of using Solution manager for controlling the transprots. Is it only because,
since Solution Manager is controlling or supporting all other factors related to an implementation projects , we can bring transport control also under it or is there any specific advantage for this purpose. Just curious about this feature.
Thanks a lot.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes Thats Right.
You should have the Domain link, for you are having two different domains together and i think you have to have Trans Directory Shared.
These can be the advantages:
1) Single place or cockpit to control the transports across the landscape /systems.
2) Integration with ChaRM becomes Easier.
This is what i can think of.
Thanks,
Jagan
Edited by: jagadheeshan govindasamy on Sep 16, 2009 7:45 AM
Thanks a lot Jagan
That was really helpfull. So i suppose only additioal work required here is to link up the domains and share trans directory..
All other operations remain same as we do in normal transports.
Points Awarded.
Regards
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Solmaniac / Satish
Thanks for your valuable inputs.
I understand that, if charm is implemented during the implemenation phase, then all the transport request should follow the approval procedure associated with charm.
Is it possible by anyway, that we can avoid implementing Charm and still manage all the transport requests using Solution manager. Please provide some inputs on controlling TMS using Solution Manager.
Thank You.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
If you dont want to use the workflow/approvals associated with the chaRM correction document for your implementation; you can just use the maintenance cycles to control movement.
You just need to use option 'Register transport requests in tasklist'. This will link all the transports to the tasklist but still prevent individual approvals and control which correction documents provide.
Thanks & Regards,
Kriti Bhalla
#1 reason not to adopt ChaRM for implementation is that:
- Each transport request must be created before the developer / configurer begins their work
- each transport request must be approved as part of a change request before it can be created
Obviously this is not practical during implementation phases.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
The following may not be the detailed reasons behind not recommending CHARM during implementation phase.
Implementation Project u2013 A project to implement SAP solution as a part of regular implementation or a roll out. This is considered for single-site implementations. Predefined scenarios can be selected from template projects.
Change Request Management (ChaRM) is an SAP tool to manage all those activities performed between the design of a change and the final promotion to a productive system
ChaRM can:
o Improve efficiency and transparency of change management processes
o Minimize business disruptions
o Store documentation of implemented changes
o Track and monitor changes
o Improve audit process
o Reduce risk of correction and project failures
ChaRM benefits are:
o Allow the Organization to control and manage changes in the SAP system effectively
o Guarantee that any change to the SAP system follows the standard process flow and procedures with mandatory controls and documented steps
o Effectively adheres to requirements for SOX compliance
Please also go through [this|http://www.sap.com/community/webcast/2009_06_worldtour_fr/2009_06_Worldtour_SOL1_SAP_fr.pdf] document.
Hope it helps.
Cheers,
Satish
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.