cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Wait Step is taking more time than specified

vuyyurujyothi
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi All,

I have included wait step for 1 minute in BPM. But it is taking more than 30 minutes instead of 1 minute.

Could any one help me on this?

Help will be rewarded.

Thanks & Regards,

Jyothi.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (4)

Answers (4)

vuyyurujyothi
Participant
0 Kudos

I removed wait step and used java code instead of that.

santhosh_kumarv
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi,

Chech if all the jobs are scheduled correctly in SWF_XI_CUSTOMIZING if u find any jobs in error status just perform an Automatic BPM Customizing.

refer my wiki... [BPM Trouble Shooting Deadline Step|https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/XI/BPMTroubleShootingDeadlineStep]

~SaNv...

vuyyurujyothi
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Santosh,

Everything is fine there.

Thanks and Regards,

Jyothi.

rajasekhar_reddy14
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Jyothi,

Betetr to speak with your SAP Admin guy,i think he may help you.

I never faces this type of issue.

Regards,

Raj

rajasekhar_reddy14
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi ,

Remove wait step from Intergration process and execute the scenario,if its executed in short time then problem with wait step.

then create wait step once again.

Regards,

Raj

vuyyurujyothi
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Michal and Raja,

Thank you for your immediate response.

Wait Step is working fine some times and sometimes not.

I am wondering why it is behaving like that.

Please give your inputs on this.

Thanks and Regards,

Jyothi.

rajasekhar_reddy14
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

its very starange,which version of XI r u using??

vuyyurujyothi
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi Raja,

It is XI 3.0 with service pack 20.

Is there any background job to perform this?

Thanks and Regards,

Jyothi.

MichalKrawczyk
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

hi,

>>>Could any one help me on this?

remove the wait step

add it once more and specify 1 minute again

save, activate

wait step cannot wait any longer then specified so try recreating it as I've described

Regards,

Michal Krawczyk