Skip to Content

Archived discussions are read-only. Learn more about SAP Q&A

Vendor Master Extension in SRM


I am working on Vendor master table enhancement in SRM 4.0. I have added a new field in the master table using transaction EEWB. The new field is created successfully and can be seen in table BUT000.

Using badi BBP_BUPA_GET_CUF I am showing this field on SRM transaction BBPMAININT and is getting maintained correctly from there.

It is not getting maintained when I am replicating vendors in SRM from R/3 i.e. transaction BBPGETVD. For this I have implemented badi BBP_MAP_VMDATA_CF in backend R/3 system and badi BBP_GET_VMDATA_CF on SRM side. In the debug mode I can see that the data mapped in R/3 is coming correctly in SRM badi. In this BADI I am using Function Module ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_DSAVB generated during EEWB transaction. But this FM is not storing any value in the tables. Badi help doc says for single field creation using EEWB, a FM ZZG01_BUPA_API_DETAIL_ADD gets generated and by passing Partner No and new fields Value (captured from R/3) the field can be populated. But in actual such FM is not generated and above mentioned FM (ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_DSAVB) does not have any importing or exporting values. Is this caz of EEWC configuration? Or is there any other way by which I can achieve this.

Please do update if any one have ever worked on such requirement before.

Thanks in advance.


Former Member

Hi Rahul,

this is right.

When using EEWB, the system will generate all needed ABAP objects (tables, data elements, structure, FM, BUPA events...).

The object name depends on the customer name space you have defined before using EEWB: Z or ZZ or YY...

So the FM can look like this:





01 can be replaced by 02, 03, etc...

So you must first use the GET_DETAILS, the CHANGE if some data already exist or the ADD if not.

You must not call FM ZZG00_BUPA_EVENT_DSAVB because this one will be called in the standard by save events.

And your added/updated data will be stored in DB.



0 View this answer in context
Not what you were looking for? View more on this topic or Ask a question