on 07-21-2009 10:36 PM
I have an existential question regarding BPM's...
If message 1 starts a BPM and message 2 starts another instance of the same BPM later.
If the calls to the BPM are done using EOIO... will this assure me that the BPM's will run in sequence ?
This means, if a step in BPM instance 1 takes a long time and BPM instance 2 goes faster... it should wait for BPM 1 to go before continuing...
If not, why have EOIO ????
Is this actually stated somewhere in the documentation... ?
Edited by: Thierry Dagnino on Jul 21, 2009 5:36 PM
Hi ,
To achieve this we are having the FORK in BPM , Parallel processing and you can break this by using a codition
Regards,
Jude
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
83 | |
24 | |
12 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.