07-17-2009 1:55 PM
Can you tell me the table that is transported along with roles when we transport a particular role.Is it AGR_1251
Thanks
Roshan
07-17-2009 2:19 PM
> Can you tell me the table that is transported along with roles when we transport a particular role.Is it AGR_1251
That's one of the tables that are relevant for role contents, but why don't you just (have basis) look at the contents/details of transport request containing roles?
And why do you want to know anyway? What is the problem you're trying to solve?
07-17-2009 4:38 PM
When we transported role from one system(Say quality ) to another system (Say Production )associated authorizations also moved to production system .Now You have asked
What are the tables transported along with role !
I would say ,Table is not transported physically .When we transport role Table data transfers from Quality to production .You want to know what
tables data are transfering , Generally , Lot of tables are assoicated with roles .SOme of them are below:
USR10 Authorisation profiles (i.e. &_SAP_ALL)
USR11 Text for authorisation profiles
USR12 Authorisation values
USR13 Short text for authorisation
USGRP User groups
USGRPT Text table for USGRP
USH02 Change history for logon data
USR01 User Master (runtime data)
USER_ADDR Address Data for users AGR_1016 Name of the activity group profile
AGR_1016B Name of the activity group profile
AGR_1251 Authorization data for the activity group
AGR_1252 Organizational elements for authorizations
AGR_AGRS Roles in Composite Roles
AGR_DEFINE Role definition
AGR_HIER2 Menu structure information - Customer vers
FOr e.g : I am describing here one table : USR12 (Authorisation values ),when we transport role then associated values are also transported .So data in USR12 table transfer
to production table of USR12.
SO ACTUALLY , table data is moving when we transfering roles to Production system.
Please let me know,if any doubt remaining..
For others ,Please correct me if ,I am wrong.
Regards
Vikas rana
07-18-2009 9:22 AM
> For others ,Please correct me if ,I am wrong.
Basically, you are. Just summing up an incomplete list of role-related tables isn't going to help the original poster in any way. Besides that, your post may show up in future search results for role transports and it will be of no help there either.
Forum participation isn't about replying as much as you can, it's about helping people. If you observe my posting behaviour you'll notice there are areas like ldap, the java stack, single sign on, etcetera where I do not contribute as I do not have sufficient knowledge on those subjects.
Now about the role transports and tables:
When transporting roles, the information from a lot of tables is taken, but if you look at the actual transport in SE10 those aren't there. (At least not the ones I would expect to be there, like the AGR* tables) This must mean the information in the transport is redistributed over the relevant tables on importing the transport in the target client.
I've created a test transport containing one composite, some single roles and a derived role and found the following information in SE10:
5 Object List of Request
4 Comment Entry: Released
4 Role
5 Table Contents
4 AGR_TIMEB
4 SPERS_OBJ
4 USR12
4 USR13
4 UST12
5 Customizing: Table Contents
5 SUSPR
4 USR10
4 USR11
4 UST10C
4 UST10S
4 Request Attributes
So only the USR10, 11, 12, and 13 in your list (and I suspect it's a copy-paste off some other site) were lucky guesses. How did you ever think this was going to help?
My question to remains: what is the problem you're trying to solve? Only when we know which way you want to go we can help you in the right direction.
07-20-2009 11:18 PM
Are you trying to create your own PFCG?
There are inherent risks in doing this, as the functions are not released and subject to change without warning.
Generally a bad idea. Not sustainable.
Cheers,
Julius
07-21-2009 3:39 PM
07-21-2009 5:02 PM
>
> thanks i got my answer
And now we want to know which one that was. Please share it with us.