on 07-01-2009 8:36 PM
Hello,
I have a scenario wherein, am trying to go for Sync Soap and Sync Proxy.
1. So it would be like Sync soap <-> XI <-> Sync Abap proxy. Firstly, is this possible?
2. Advisable to go in for BPM?
3. Better to make, soap sender async -> BPM -> sync proxy -> soap receiver async?
Which among the above would be a better approach and why?
also, am not able to locate the sync proxy blog.,
thanks,
Vishal
You should be able to do it with synchronous proxy calls.
SOAP (Sync) to ABAP Proxy (Sync)
If you have already done async proxy, it is just similar to that.
only thing is you need to read the data from the output table and write it back to the output statement
For eg: output-mt_your_message_type-fieldname
Regards,
Ravi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thank u
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Vishal,
Yes SOAP Sync soap <-> XI <-> Sync Abap proxy is possible without using BPM
Farooq !
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
1. So it would be like Sync soap <-> XI <-> Sync Abap proxy. Firstly, is this possible? - Yes
Which among the above would be a better approach and why? - The above first option is the best approach because it does not need the use of BPM and it can be designed and configured easily in XI.........Moreover since BPM is having performance issues because of the way BPM works, it is advisable to avoid BPM as much as possible.
Regards,
Rajeev Gupta
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
3. Better to make, soap sender async -> BPM -> sync proxy -> soap receiver async?
This approach is to be used only when either the Sender or receiver system does not support Sync communication....however in your case both the Sender (SOAP) and Receiver (Proxy) support Sync....so just make a direct Sync call to the Proxy from the SOAP application.......no need of BPM:)
Regards,
Abhishek.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>>Sync soap <-> XI <-> Sync Abap proxy.Firstly, is this possible?
Yes,its possible
>>Advisable to go in for BPM?
No need of BPM in this,it can be simply done without BPM.
>>Better to make, soap sender async -> BPM -> sync proxy -> soap receiver async?
No need for this too
>>Which among the above would be a better approach and why?
Develop this interface without BPM,just like a sync to sync scenario
>>am not able to locate the sync proxy blog.,
/people/community.user/blog/2006/12/12/http-to-rfc--a-starter-kit
The above is a HTTP to RFC(sync scenario) ,you can follow pretty much the same approach,just few changes to modify this blog as per your requirement.
Thanks
Aamir
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.