VF04-Billing Due List

[Former Member]

Dear Friends,

i am having some Deliveries which are due for invocie and that are showing the billing due list VF04. Now my user dont want to billing. so how to clear these documents from billing due list.

waiting for reply.

Reagrds,

Nitin

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

Hi Nitin,

This is the problem with the item category triggered in sale order which is having the option 'Delivery related billing' under the billing relevance. So with this setting the item category has already triggered in your sale order and so this item category cannot be cleared from VF04 until billing was done.

The only solution for this is to change the status of the delivery document in tables VBUK and VBUP. If there are many documents which you cannot change that each and everyone then ask your abaper to write a program (based on sale order type and item category (or anything as per your requirement) in selection screen) to change the status of the selected documents. What ever the way is, you have to change the status of the documents in tables. After completion of changing the status you have to run a program RVV05IVB to update the inconsistency in VF04 for those documents.

Check the item category settings properly for not repeating this for newly creating documents.

This is the same thing which we did for many of our clients.

Ratna

[Former Member]

We have one option called index use that index for the billing due list from delivery and u can do that

Rajesh

[Former Member]

Hi

Its a standard report funcationality, the simple solution is in VF04 - Define sort order and choose document and hide the column

thanks

satish

[Former Member]

To Know more about the [billing services|http://www.taurusquest.com/healthcare-revenuecycle-management-hospitals.aspx] visit our site.

[former_member1091983]

Hi,

I dont think in Standard process you can supress the view of a document numbe in billing due list which has the delivery status as completed. If u don want to see the document number then u have to follow the above method which was suggested by Mr.Raja.

Reg

JJ

Edited by: Jagsap on Jun 22, 2009 8:22 AM

[Former Member]

Hi,

Simple solution, Delete the deliveries and reject the sales order item. The cycle will be complete.

Thanks,

Raja

[Former Member]

hai,

Thank for reply. my user requirement is he dont want see that deliveries in billing due list. there is No deletion of deliveries.

Regdrs,

Nitin

[Former Member]

Hi Nitin,

This is the problem with the item category triggered in sale order which is having the option 'Delivery related billing' under the billing relevance. So with this setting the item category has already triggered in your sale order and so this item category cannot be cleared from VF04 until billing was done.

The only solution for this is to change the status of the delivery document in tables VBUK and VBUP. If there are many documents which you cannot change that each and everyone then ask your abaper to write a program (based on sale order type and item category (or anything as per your requirement) in selection screen) to change the status of the selected documents. What ever the way is, you have to change the status of the documents in tables. After completion of changing the status you have to run a program RVV05IVB to update the inconsistency in VF04 for those documents.

Check the item category settings properly for not repeating this for newly creating documents.

This is the same thing which we did for many of our clients.

Ratna

[Former Member]

Block these deliveries for billing

[Former Member]

Hi Nitin,

VF04 t-code is for the document which are due for the billing, And as those deliveries are due for the billing so in the t-code it will appear. How ever if you want these deliveries not to appear in VF04, you can do these,

In VF04, there is one check box : No Docs with billing block , Check that Box, and mark your a Billing block in Ur order/delivery.

Thanks,

Raja

[Former Member]

OSS note 319866 gives the exact solution.

The issue is also discussed in the following thread