on 06-16-2009 8:44 AM
Hi Experts,
I am doing file to file scenarion in which we have a requirement like
I need to drop the file at the target with specific file naming convention i.e
Vendor_rdf_date_sequencenumber, here date and sequence number are dynamic fields
Sequence number starts from 001 and it should go up to 999 and again when it reaches 999, it should start from 001 these was the requirement
Always the vendor_rdf remains same and the remaining date and seqnumber are dynamic.
example output: nokia_rdf_10022009_001 where date was 10th Feb 2009 and sequence number was 001 and the vendor was nokia and rdf defines repair data file.
can anyone through some light on this issue..
regards
sai
you can use dynamic configuration to achieve this - /people/shabarish.vijayakumar/blog/2009/03/26/dynamic-configuration-vs-variable-substitution--the-ultimate-battle-for-the-file-name
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Shabrish,
we are using pi 7.1, is there any other way to handle it in communication channel parameters, without using udf
is the udf mandatory to get this type of file naming convention and also i am not getting any value from the source in this case do i need to map with the constant and concatenate as per the requirement is this the only solution
regards,
sai
Hi Shabrish,
In the blog which u mentioned we can handle the date function dynamically but how to handle that sequence number when the scenario is executing the variable which holds the sequencenumber value is getting reintialized and i thing it will always gives the same sequence number..
regards,
sai
Shabrish,
Unfortunately we dont have any FM used in our scenario, because the source is an legacy system and we dont have any code developments at the source end, and we need to handle this at the xi part is there any other way
and also if the IDOC is coming from the source then is there any way that can be handled why because for the other interface also this file naming convention should be used..
if idoc is coming from the r/3 where can we develop this sequence logic i.e in any one of the field in IDOC
regards
sai
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.