on 06-10-2009 11:01 AM
Does Solution Manager landscape requires a typical 3 system landscape or is it like
one SOLMAN server for all the landscape.
thanks
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, it doesn't require a 3-tier landscape. But you need to think about how you are going to use Solution Manager for your project / organization. If it is connected to live processes (such as BPM, ChaRM, Service Desk, etc) then you should be thinking of having a 2-tier landscape in place at minimum.
You'll need a dev environment to test SAP notes, Support Packs, additional development, etc before you promote them to your prd environment. The same goes with configuration changes.
3-tier for SolMan might be a bit much, unless you are working in a validated environment and a QA test is a mandatory step for compliance.
This is not to say you can't have a single box for Solution Manager, I;ve seen this done before. I wouldn't recommend it though.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
the technical prerequisites for Business Process Monitoring are described in SAP note 784752. Otherwise you find plenty of information in the Media Library under https://service.sap.com/bpm
If you need functional consultants or not is somewhat depending on the scope you want to use for BPMon. You will see that BPMon provides a broad scope of out-of-the-box functionality which can be application related but can also be only used by technical guys, e.g. IDOC, qRFC, tRFC, File or background job monitoring.
So there is no general answer to it. If you want to do full-blown BPMon then you will also need functional expertise.
Regards
Volker
AAL123,
I highly recommend you to go through the RKTs for SolMan
https://websmp206.sap-ag.de/rkt
this will give you a great introduction for SolMan design, config etc.
Nesimi
Hi!
SolManiac:
If it is connected to live processes (such as BPM, ChaRM, Service Desk, etc) then you should be thinking of having a 2-tier landscape in place at minimum.
Does it mean that I should assign for my development SMsystem ERP Dev/Test and for Productive SMsystem ERP PRD? For example, I can maintain only one parameter OSS_MSG in BCOS_CUST. And If my users create messages from DEV and TST, then I will get two different bases with problem history.
The same troubles with ChaRM.
It's only my thinking. Am I right? If not please suggest solution.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
9 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.