cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Discrepancy between the confirmation and deletion of qRFC-LUWs

Former Member
0 Kudos

We have a BI process chain which is in status yellow. When I drill into thesubchain concerned it directs me to the application log in ECC where I can see the message below. I can find no trace of this message in OSS. Has anyone seen it before and/or know how to correct it? Many thanks.

There is a discrepancy between the confirmation and deletion of qRFC-LUWs

Message no. RSQU016

Diagnosis

When data was confirmed and deleted in the qRFC queue, the system found a discrepancy between the number of newly confirmed LUWs (7) and the number of LUWs to be deleted (8).

Where more LUWs are to be deleted than were previously confirmed, a previous delete attempt was terminated.

The LUWs were confirmed but not completely deleted from the qRFC and tRFC tables. The confirmation already ensures that the data is not transferred into the BW again with a subsequent request.

Delta extraction was continued.

Procedure

You do not need to do anything urgently.

If the message also arises during all subsequent delta requests, contact SAP Support with the message number at hand. In this case, there is a danger that the qRFC and tRFC tables run at full capacity, which may also affect other applications.

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (1)

Answers (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

Please check the link and Note 500316 - Delta request: No more deletion from the DeltaQueue

Thank you,

Shyam

Former Member
0 Kudos

Finally put this one through to SAP. They suggested we do as follows:

Run the report RSC1_DIAGNOSIS in the source system as per

note 583086. The result should show inconsistencies of TIDs that have an entry in

TRFCQOUT, but not in ARFCSTATE. If these LUWs have already been loaded successfully to BW they can be deleted via SE16 or by using report RSTRFCQDS according to note 760113.

In fact I subsequently managed to clear the error in the process chain and we have been running normally. As it was only our quality system I wasn't too particular about checking the data.