cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

bpm:message being sent and wait for event

xinjiang_li
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,gurus:

My scenario is about BPM.In the integration process I used a loop and correlation.The scenario worked successfully yesterday,but after I changed some thing,it did not work.The outbound status of the message in sxi_monitor said "message being sent".And when I clicked PE to see the workflow log, it said " wait for event".

Thanks in advance.

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

former_member200962
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
The scenario worked successfully yesterday,but after I changed some thing,it did not work

did you check SXI_CACHE for the return code of BPM (0).....

did you check SWWL for error instance of your BPM

did you reimport your BPM in ID....

If no then do the above mentioned.....

xinjiang_li
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,abhishek:

Could you tell me how to reimport the integration progress in ID?

former_member200962
Active Contributor
0 Kudos
Could you tell me how to reimport the integration progress in ID?

reimport means...delete the already imported BPM from ID.....this would affect the corresponding ID objects....save and activate....and then again run the import Integration Process wizard....create the objects once again.....seems time consuming.....hence mentioned it as the last option in the list:(

Also from SWWL delete only the instance with status as ERROR.

Edited by: abhishek salvi on May 20, 2009 9:30 AM

xinjiang_li
Active Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,abhishek,

I reimported the BPM,but the problem persists(the outbound status of the message in sxi_monitor is "message being sent").

In SWWL,there were no error workitems but waiting ones,and I deleted all the items,but still not work.

In SXI_CACHE,the status of BPM is green.

When my loop of the BPM is twice and 3 times,the problem exist,but when the loop is once,there are no problems.

Any ideas?

Edited by: xinjiang li on May 20, 2009 12:50 PM

xinjiang_li
Active Participant
0 Kudos

It was resloved also by doing a redundant change of corrlation.

Thanks your advise.

Answers (0)