on 05-14-2009 10:57 AM
Hi everybody,
we are polling a JDBC-table MYTABLE. The result of the JDBC-poll is mapped into a RFC. The RFC itself gives a response. The RFC-response is now mapped to a JDBC-Update statement on table MYTABLE.
We don not want to use BPM.
How do we have to configure the objects the RFC-response to the JDBC-Update in directory?
Is this possibe?
Thanks
regards Mario
The only way to avoid BPM is the use of adapter modules at JDBC sender - RequestResponseBean and ResponseOneWayBean.
Regards,
Prateek
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
In such case you need to develop one more async interface RFC-XI-JDBC, which will update the JDBC table. This interface you can trigger from within your first interface receiver RFC.
Also note in case of sender JDBC you have upate statement in CC, which can be used for temporary updation of table ( to indicate the data is picked ) and final updation done through this second interface ( to indicate success or failure ).
Regards,
Siddhesh S.Tawate
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You just need to follow similar to what has been described in this wiki.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/wiki?path=/display/xi/file-rfc-file(Without+BPM)
Just that your communication channels will be JDBC instead of FIle adapter
Regards,
Ravi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
90 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
7 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.