cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

assigned is higher than budget amount

Former Member
0 Kudos

Good afternoon,

In S_ALR_87013558 and CJ33, we can see that assigned amount is higher than actual amount. As a result the available value is negative.Moreover the available control is active. What I have to do to fix this negative value? Is it possible?

Marcel

Edited by: Marcel Nakazawa on May 13, 2009 8:45 PM

Accepted Solutions (0)

Answers (8)

Answers (8)

pmapugay
Discoverer
0 Kudos

I also encountered the same issue. Incorrect total assigned values (actual + commitments) are displayed in S_ALR_87013558 report which cause the negative available budget. I was able to correct it by ticking the "Planning" control indicator in OPSC config, then run CJEN to reconstruct the project info database.

Former Member
0 Kudos

HI,

Is the Project Budget is planned year wise ?

If yes go to CJCO run with detail list, check the Previous year Budget if you find carry forward values are still available in the column then carry forward the same to the Current year then check the respective WBS budget value and assigned value, (check all previous year)

for eg: if Carry forward Value is pending in 2011 remove the test run and execute, values will move to 2012 again for 2012 and again 2013 u have to run

Thanks

Regards,

Naveendradoss

0 Kudos


You can follow the steps in SAP document 1746429 to check if there is inconsistency.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Good morning,

I check the AVAC, the limits and the system says that are active.

I tried to use RKANBU01, CJEN and CJBN without sucess.

Former Member
0 Kudos

Try by copying these reports from main client i.e.000.

Regards,

Sudhir

Mrinal_K_Roy
Active Contributor
0 Kudos

Hi Marcel,

Assigned value is total of actual cost and commitments. Please check your tolerance limit , it should not have limit more than 100 %.

With regards,

Mrinal

Former Member
0 Kudos

Marcel,

Check the Tolerance Limits in IMG, what are all the values maintained in Usage field there, if any value is there more than 100, then this could cuase the problem.

And also check any value is maintained in Abs. variance field fo the Tolerance Limit.

Regards,

Praveen.

former_member604117
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi

I have also the same problem.How to resolve this.

Regards

John

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello John,

When I have this kind of error, I run the following transactions CJEN,CJBV.

Marcel

anishpv
Participant
0 Kudos

Hi,

In reports availability control is always passive.

So please check and confirm the exact values in budget release

goto extras--> availability control --> analysis.

regards

pv

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi Marcel,

First check why Assigned is higher.There are two possibilities for this,

first somebody might have deactivated the AVAC and the post actuals,

second Actuals have exceeded while doing GR/SES and as a standard AVAC doesnt check budget while doing GR/SES.

But there is option of making AVAC check while GR by implementing note from OSS.

Suggest you to increase the budget or if above case implement the note.

Regards,

Nitin

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hi ,

Check tolerance limits

SPRO >PS>Budget> define tolerance limits

Check is their tolerance check is excluded for transaction grp.

Check the Exempted cost elements Transaction OPTK if any.

Rgds

Former Member
0 Kudos

hi Marcel,

just run CJEN for that project & try..

REg,

\Sam