on 05-12-2009 8:50 AM
Hello Experts,
We have a Proxy-to-File scenario, is it possible to receive on SAP-backend side acknolegement that the file was succesfully delivered to target FTP server.
What are the options for this requirement? The only solution I can see right now is a BPM, where there is a transport acknowlegement selected on Send step. But are there are any other?
Best Regards
You can request an acknowledgment in the ABAP proxy client code.
This is described in the online help.
Regards
Stefan
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Kindly check this for Querying the XI Message Header
Using this protocol you can query the fields of the message header after a proxy call.
[http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/a1/082589fc4246f09793039d5fb01a17/frameset.htm]
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
BPM is the only solution and File adapter supports only transport acknowledgement and not application ack.
Regards,
Manisha
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>
> Hello Experts,
>
> We have a Proxy-to-File scenario, is it possible to receive on SAP-backend side acknolegement that the file was succesfully delivered to target FTP server.
>
> What are the options for this requirement? The only solution I can see right now is a BPM, where there is a transport acknowlegement selected on Send step. But are there are any other?
>
> Best Regards
nothing by standard other than the acknowledgment via the send step in BPM exist.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
>
> Hello Shabarish,
>
> Thanks a lot for your response!
>
> Maybe you know how this standart acknolegemnt mechanism works? What makes Adapter to send acknowlegemnt back to BPM? Maybe BPM sets some flag on message header?
>
> I am thinking about somehow to simulate this without the BPM.
I am not sure about the underlying activity. But the step steps forces a request for acknowledgment in this case. I will wait to see if anybody can explain this. Will be a good info to know.
Anyway,
In case you got for a customized way, you may lose out on performance, hence since there is a standard functionality available, do opt for the same.
User | Count |
---|---|
86 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.