Is EOIO messaging possible using ABAP Proxy in WAS 620?

[Former Member]

Hello,

I am trying to implement an outbound EOIO interface using ABAP Proxy on a SAP R/3 470 running on WAS 620. We have XI 3.0 running on WAS 640. I followed the SAP documentation available at http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/c9/74246d8ad2447799063d39013e9a11/frameset.htm

I find that the interface IF_WSPROTOCOL_ASYNC_MESSAGING required in this exaple does not exist in our R/3 system. I also notice that proxy classes generated on WAS 640 have the superclass of CL_PROXY_BASIS. But the proxy object generated in WAS 620 have no superclass at all.

Does anybody know how I can get EOIO interfaces to work on the WAS 620? Did you use these objects? Can I import / install them somehow? Or, is EOIO just not possible in WAS 620?

Please let me know.

Regards

Cerish Chemparathy

[Former Member · Accepted solution]

HI,

have a look at this link to the ABAP Proxy Runtime based on WAS 6.20 (Xi 2.0) http://help.sap.com/saphelp_xi20sr1/helpdata/en/02/265c3cf311070ae10000000a114084/content.htm

There is a help entry called Guatanteeing the Order of Asynchronous Messages. Seems that you somehow can set a queue id for this messages and as long as theses messages are all in the same queue, the order will be maintained.

Your observations are right, there are differences between the Proxy Runtime in WAS 6.20 and in WAS 6.40 and as far as i know, there is no way to downport the 6.40 runtime to 6.20. You will need to stick with wath 6.20 offers.

Regards

Christine

[Former Member]

Posted reply to wrong thread.

However, see http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/65/40c9a4a1fa476288ac61b5fcc6bbde/frameset.htm

Thanks.

[moorthy]

HI,

There is a Serialization Concept-

Did u check these links- May be useful.

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/20/46e3e5975b4de49f222519dd2b7dee/frameset.htm

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/65/40c9a4a1fa476288ac61b5fcc6bbde/frameset.htm

Hope this give some idea,

Regards,

Moorthy

[Former Member]

Yes. That link was very helpful. Thank you very much.