Too many areas in a multi-planning area
Just designing my system landscape at the moment. We have about 5 areas to link together in a multi-area, but most of the time we'll just be looking at data in 2 areas.
Is there an overhead associated with having the additional 3 areas in there (of course we'll always be specifying the relevant areas using the planning area characteristic)?
If there is no overhead, then i'll stick to one multi-area as then i only have to set up variables etc on one area.