cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Generic Synchronization: Why line number of items dont increment?

Former Member
0 Kudos

Hello All,

When i create OutboundContainer and add items to it.

And call for Synchronization.

Now if i look at trace file then the line numbers for

The item are 0 for all the items.

Following ia code snap.

<b>

container.addItem("ID",ID);

container.addItem("DOB",dob);

container.addItem("NAME",name);

</b>

The trace file contents are

<CONTAINER>

<HEADER>

<CONTAINER_ID>010a6886cea18eeb8875</CONTAINER_ID>

<OWNER>ICS400015</OWNER>

<CONTAINER_TYPE>R</CONTAINER_TYPE>

<METHOD>GET_WORKFLOW_ITEMS</METHOD>

<CONVERSATION_ID>10270A74F199C845AE01120C107DEC6B</CONVERSATION_ID>

<PARENT_CONTAINER_ID></PARENT_CONTAINER_ID>

<MESSAGE_INDEX>-1</MESSAGE_INDEX>

<MESSAGE_TYPE> </MESSAGE_TYPE>

<SERVER_ID>NEW_PROTOCOL</SERVER_ID>

<BODY_TYPE></BODY_TYPE>

<BODY_LENGTH>0</BODY_LENGTH>

<SUB_CONTAINER_ID>-1</SUB_CONTAINER_ID>

<SUB_CONT_MAX>3</SUB_CONT_MAX>

<ITEM_FROM>-1</ITEM_FROM>

<ITEM_TO>-1</ITEM_TO>

</HEADER>

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>ID</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>0</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>9999ASH</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>DOB</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>0</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>11-11-1982</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>NAME</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>0</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>Abhijit</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

</CONTAINER>

Accepted Solutions (1)

Accepted Solutions (1)

Former Member
0 Kudos

hello abhijit,

it will only be incremented if you have items of the same

name. e.g.;

container.addItem("ID",ID);

container.addItem("ID",dob);

container.addItem("ID",name);

you will get something like:

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>ID</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>0</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>9999ASH</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>ID</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>1</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>11-11-1982</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

<ITEM>

<FIELD_NAME>ID</FIELD_NAME>

<LINE_NUMBER>2</LINE_NUMBER>

<FIELD_VALUE>Abhijit</FIELD_VALUE>

</ITEM>

regards

jo

Former Member
0 Kudos

Thank you jo.

Answers (0)