on 04-14-2009 5:00 PM
Hi all,
We are struggling with a standard absence approval (leave requests) using a copy of the standard workflow template WS12300111.
On the "approval process" step as agent we select a rule 00000168 = Superior (as user) for...
On the binding area and we have an error:
"Container element 'ORG_AGENT' does not exist".
This is valid for both source and target container.
Binding Workflow -> Rule 'Superior (as user) for...' we have:
&_WF_INITIATOR& -> &ORG_AGENT&
My questions are: this is normal behavior since this is a copy from the standard workflow?
How we can resolve it?
Any hints are welcome!
Thanks in advance,
Eugen
Hi eugen,
If you facing problems in binding ,follow the belowmentioned steps -
1) asign rule = 000000168 for task.
2) select red and white button of define binding automatically and select continue.
This would generate the right binding.
Thanks,
sahiba
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Vijay,
Yes, I already tried that.But we don't have all the elements on that specific rule 168...
However, the elements you mentioned i did find them but within rule 157.
We tried to use the rule 157, but the result is not good: the workflow is unable to find the approver and is stuck within approval process...
Hi Vijay,
Well I follow your advice.
So I made a simple workflow (another one) with one decision point with 2 branches: approve or reject.
On agent assignment, I assigned a SAP user (hardcoded). The Leave request (hence the workflow) is working very fine.
Then come back and changed the settings to agent assignment, to a rule: 157 Manager - Superior (chief position).
The binding operation was successfully completed with parameters you mentioned already. Auto function was working fine but i double check. So far, so good.
Then when trying to send the leave request the system displays the error message:
"Unable to send the request".
At this moment I'm out of any options/ideas ...
Eugen
Hi Eugen
For the leave workflow u should not bind WF_INITIATOR U should bind
&REQ.INITIATOR.PERNR& -
> objid
otype ( P ) -
> otype
Create a workflow container element as otype and put initial value has 'P'.
Now it will work.
Regards
vijay
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Can you assign this
&_WF_INITIATOR& --> &ORG_OBJECT&
in the Rule Binding, instead of &_WF_INITIATOR& -> &ORG_AGENT&Regards,
Surjith
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello,
What version are you using? In 46C the 168 rule has ORG_OBJECT as a parameter.
regards
Rick Bakker
Hanabi Technology
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.