on 04-02-2009 4:25 AM
Hi, All
I met a problem with NW RFC SDK 7.11 when using RFCGetFunctionDesc to access a ABAP which is defined by myself. I used to access this function with RFC classic SDK successfully, however, when i use NW RFC SDK and use RFCGetFunctionDesc to access this ABAP function, it returns the "RFC_INVALID_PARAMETER" and with error message "inconsistence in description detected: non-unicode length is too small". And My application can retrieve the function Description handle of other ABAP functions, I'm wondering if it's a bug in NW RFC SDK
I search the network and found someone has the same problem:https://weblogs.sdn.sap.com/cs/user/view/cs_msg/28225
Could someone share some tips to diagnose this problem.
Best Regards
Having the same problem with the latest NW RFC SDK 7.20 and a Basis 620 server (SAPKB62060).
The release notes for NW RFC SDK 7.11 patch 1 and 2 say this was fixed, but apparently it wasn't, or at least not for all server versions.
I'm wondering how to get around this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
It seems you need to install current patch level (NWRFC_1-2000xxxx.SAR) of the SAP NW RFC SDK, as described in Note 1025361.
Please check Note 1236530 - SAP NW RFC SDK 7.11 -- Patch level 1
Thank you,
Shyam
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
hi, thanks for you reply.
Actually what I installed is NWRFC_1-20004550.SAR, which I believe is the latest NW RFC SDK. And also my error is not identical to the one described in the release notes of SAP NW RFC SDK 7.11 -- Patch level 1
Here is more info about what I tried:
My BAPI function is simple, no import/export/change , but only a table parameter.
I use the DDIF_FIELDINFO_GET function to check this table , and found the structure length of this type is equal to the sum of offset and intlen of last field.
My system info : SAP_BASIS release 640, SAP_BW release 350.
So do you have any other suggestions.
Best Regards
User | Count |
---|---|
87 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
5 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.