02-20-2009 10:07 PM
Hello -
We are upgrading to ECC 6.0 and are unsure what to do about losing the config for former transaction OFBW; where we indicated what inventory movement types were budget relevant. In our 6.0 test client we tested all the goods issue movement types we use and they all update FM as we expect them to and this is without affecting the derivation for the loss of transaction OFBW. I doubt the system is pulling from this former config that is no longer present in 6.0 (even thought we can still diplay this in 6.0). Note that I was able to successfully affect the derivation table to now derive the warehouse funds centers, since we lost that config in 6.0 too (former transaction FMLF).
Should we be concerned that things are working in 6.0 as they have in the past for the movement types without us affecting anything for this to happen?
Any thoughts?
Colleen
02-23-2009 2:13 PM
Hello Colleen
You should review this note:
700485 PSM: Convert customizing for warehouse funds ctr scenarios
There is also some useful documentation in the online help, see the attached link , chapter 'Recording Actual and Commitment Data ->Integration with Materials Management '
Hope it helps
Kind regards
Mar
03-01-2009 7:13 AM
There is also a flag in FMDERIVE <Movement Type (Inventory Management)> that you can use to identify which movement type is budget relevant.
Cy