Performance of XI Integration Engine

[Former Member]

Hi,

Scenario: RFC <=> PI <=> HTTP

In our landscape, we have more number of RFC to HTTP interfaces(syn). I need to know about the effect in the performance of PI Integration Engine as messages per sec will be large. Specifically, how RFC Adapter will perform under high load conditons.

Regards,

Manikandan R

[former_member267355 · Accepted solution]

Hi,

Performance of RFC adapter will be slow when you work with large number of messages. In that case you can go ahead with proxies which is preferred when you deal with large number of messages.

Regards,

Sakthi

[udo_martens]

Hi Manikandan,

especially synchronous large message could lead to problems, it could be a good idea to wrap the RFCs:

ABAP proxy (wrapping FM) <=> PI <=> HTTP would have a better performance (the reason is the native XI adapter, you dont need J2EE adapter engine).

Regards,

Udo

[prateek]

There won't be problem with RFC adapter to handle large message. But it would be better if you use ABAP proxy as it could provide adapterless communiction thereby preventing the context switch between abap and java engines.

If you are thinking only in terms of Integration Engine, then type of adapter does not matter. In the integration engine, it is complexity of mapping that matters. If the structures involved are too larger, then you may prefer xsl mapping otherwise graphical mapping is a suitable choice.

Regards,

Prateek

[Former Member]

Kindly have the a look at the following links....This will tell you the process to enable High volume of data transfer efficiently

/people/william.li/blog/2008/03/07/step-by-step-guide-in-processing-high-volume-messages-using-pi-71s-message-packaging

https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/9056c89c-1a2e-2a10-8a99-eae154e7...

http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/42/e7bb8f7c9d3ee0e10000000a1553f6/frameset.htm

This will Help you out..................................

BR,

Sainath