on 01-17-2009 5:51 AM
Hi Friends
system should not allow the nagative posting at the time of billing
i hav cheked the functionality of billing type in T-code VOFA, there already no negative posting is selected
but system is allowing negative posting at the time of billing
can any one tell any other configurable changes for not to allow negative posting
Hi friends
can any one tell how can we stop the negative biiling posting becoz when the net value is in nagative system allowing to do posting, but our requirement is to stop the negative billing posting
plz reply soon
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Venkata Ramana
Go to OMJ1 and deselect the box against the respective plant
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear Venkata,
When customer request to post his all paybles as receiveable, in one side,the this type of posting is called negative posting. For this you have to check the "Negative posting" field in the concerned billng type. The same is already done by you in T. Code: VOFA, as confirmed in your first post. Also for this, approval of Financial Accounting is required.
A condition type is negative or positive such as price is positive whereas discount is negative in the pricing procedure.
In case you want to make an adjustment for crediting or debiting the customer, there is a mechanism called Account Key and Account Determination by which the billing document posted to GL Accounts and all such postings are positive. Only difdference of credit or debit is that they are posted to different GL Accounts in such a way so as to give an effect of credit or debit.
A useful documentation is being provided by SAP-Help.
[SAP Help - Forwarding Billing Data to Financial Accounting|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/fr/dd/561393545a11d1a7020000e829fd11/frameset.htm]
Hope, this would be helpful to you, some extent.
Best Regards,
Amit
User | Count |
---|---|
108 | |
12 | |
11 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 | |
3 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.