01-15-2009 1:39 PM
Hi all,
I have a query related to Reference DC.
We have 4 storage locations (S.Loc) to the Ref.DC 'RFDC' & the same is been used for all our DC's
But, Now can I add one more S.Loc to the Ref. DC?
Also want to understand if we add any new S Loc to the Ref. DC, do we have to take any precautions for the same...i.e any pre requisite activity that need to be followed.
Regards,
Kumar.....
01-16-2009 12:31 AM
Hi Kumar,
Sure you can add a new S/L for the reference DC, I can't see there's any 'precautions' need beware.
The only question is: why do you want to do it?
Regards,
Steven
01-16-2009 12:31 AM
Hi Kumar,
Sure you can add a new S/L for the reference DC, I can't see there's any 'precautions' need beware.
The only question is: why do you want to do it?
Regards,
Steven
01-16-2009 6:30 PM
hi steven,
Thanks for the reply,
I will give you the details of my query:
Our S/L for DC & Ref DC are 10, 20, 30, 40. which are being used from long time.
Recently We created new S/L 50, 60, 70, 80 to a new DC 1234 as per business requirement.
But when the old articles got listed to this new DC, it started giving a msg S/L '10' doesn't exist for site 1234.
As S/L '10' comes by default and is not defined as a S/L in site 1234.
Then we have to go in MM42, and then change the S/L to 50 manually.
As the articles were in large number, i thought of using MASS.
but in here it is giving me an error saying, S/L 50 doesnt exist for Ref DC 'RFDC'.
so, I wanted to add the S/L 50 for RFDC, so that I can use the MASS transaction to change the S/L of those articles.
let me know, if there requires any attention.
I found a note, 1038417. Iam talking about the same error.
Unfortunately, I couldn't replicate the scenario in my sandbox/testing clients hence couldnt implement the instructions as per the sap note.
Regards,
kumar..
Edited by: kumar on Jan 18, 2009 10:51 AM
01-18-2009 9:13 PM
In this case you should add S/L 50 to RFDC.
You could aslo update the reference article if you want to default it for further new articles creation.
Regards,
Steven
02-25-2009 3:16 PM
note applied.
we also removed the entries in MARD table for the RFDC and S.Loc 50 combination (which were created before applying the note).
problem solved.
thanks,
kumar