I have a senario,in the sales order i have given a header condition ZCAR which splits at item level.Now at the item level if i am rejecting a line item then how can i reassign the value of ZCAR(which has already been assigned to the rejected item) to the remaining line items.
header condition value distribution is done correctly when items are rejected as long as reason for rejection is selected "x".
BUT when i create a sales order with reference from a quatation header condition value is not reassigned correctly to the remaining line items. reason for rejection is selected as "X" and in copying control from quatation to sales order pricing type is A.
thats not the solution dear since header condition has assigned the values to the line items and when one line item is being rejected the system is not reassigning the values to the remaining line items....i checked the senario what u asked for but still its not working
For billing it would not matter but it will give problems if someone wants to see the order values for a month or value of orders that is pending for delivery.
In the customization for Reason for rejection, just make the values of the field 'Stat' to 'X' for any one of the reason of rejection and all the problems will be solved.
If you apply that reason, then Header net value is also decreased and on saving/Price updating, the header condition value is also redistributed to the other line items.
And all this while i was thinking that how SAP can be so illogical.
OK...but that is not a solution to this problem. You have brought out a very valid problem.
What if i dont want to delete the line item and just want to reject it..........then how will it happen afterall, we all know that rejection is a better way than deleting stuff in the sales order.
I always thought that it will get reassigned automatically but that is not happening.
yes u r right...but thats not happening...once i reject the line item...logically the system should ressign the header condition value to the remaining line item...but the system is not behaving that way...can any one throw light on this...?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.