on 12-06-2008 12:48 PM
Can any one suggest
Is better to have multiple arrays or multiple partitions within the arrays?
while laying the SQL DB in SAN
following two case will help understand the issue in a better way
Lets assume - the database looks like -- DB1 , DB2, DB3 , DBlog
Case 1
Single Raid 5 array - with 4 LUN as separate drive letter for all each DB and log
Case 2
One Raid 1 & 3 Raid 5 array as 4 individual drive for each DB & Log file
Which option will give better result - consider all other param like FC / SAS / Disk RPM / Size etc same for both the case
Thanks
Arindam
Having separate LUNs enable you (depending on your SAN) to configuring caching separately. I would go for this way.
Markus
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
thanks for the quick tips , just like to know - if I am going for a LUN modle - that is Single Array with multiple LUN as logical drive - Will disk size play any role ?
like if the total requirement is 2TB - can a RIAD 5 consist of 76GB each will give better performance than a raid 5 consist of 300GB each
or it will not differ much u2013 it itu2019s mater ........in what degree ?
> like if the total requirement is 2TB - can a RIAD 5 consist of 76GB each will give better performance than a raid 5 consist of 300GB each
> or it will not differ much u2013 it itu2019s mater ........in what degree
The speed of the database is mainly determined by the number of spindles. To enable an optimal parallelism I would create as many data files as there are spindles/disks so for each available physical disk in the SAN one datafile.
Markus
Let me explain the situation Iu2019m facing now
I have a storage (SAN) of 300GBX7 SAS disk in Raid 5 array , total array is divided in to 2 LUN
LUN 01 350GB for Data backup , LUN02 u2013 390 GB for SQL DB 1 , DB 2, DB 3, and the log file
We are facing a terrible performance issue u2013 though Disk write Queue is less than 3 but disk read queue is always more than 70 u2013 sometime 100 , and OS06 is showing 100% utilization in most of the time - and finally users are getting very slow response
Can you please through some lights how to overcome the situation u2013 I want to disk read / write queue to come closure to zero.
User | Count |
---|---|
85 | |
10 | |
10 | |
10 | |
7 | |
6 | |
6 | |
5 | |
4 | |
4 |
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.